Charles Bukowski

Tristram a écrit:Bien sympa, ce petit poème...
SMART SET, c'est une chaîne de mode féminine, c'est ça ?

Bukowski, c'est le vieux vilain, le personnage laid qu'on rencontre dans les contes de fées. On le dirait sorti d'un conte de Grimm ! C'est le personnage mythique du gnome, du bossu, le personnage disgracieux, la bête. Il incarne le côté répulsif, la figure effrayante et menaçante du père aussi. Il a l'aspect difforme du type qui suinte la souffrance et qui en même temps exerce un profond attrait sexuel. Toute une part de notre psyché est très attirée par cela. Par cette figure du satyre. Mais en même temps, c'est quelqu'un qui s'exprime à merveille. Car il y a ce renversement : il est aussi l'artiste, le poète, l'écrivain, qui traduit et exprime par la parole cette vision singulière du monde, et qui y excelle. Un personnage surprenant, vraiment, qui met le doigt sur quelque chose de très mystérieux, de très particulier dans la conscience américaine, qui porte l'accent sur les aspects sordides de la vie, et qui a le don de mettre à nu toute la lassitude du monde.

7-22-85

Dear Hans van den Broek:

Thank you for your letter telling me of the removal of one of my books from the Nijmegen library. And that it is accused of discrimination against black people, homosexuals and women. And that it is sadism because of the sadism.

The thing that I fear discriminating against is humor and truth.

If I write badly about blacks, homosexuals and women it is because of these who I met were that. There are many "bads"--bad dogs, bad censorship; there are even "bad" white males. Only when you write about "bad" white males they don't complain about it. And need I say that there are "good" blacks, "good" homosexuals and "good" women?

In my work, as a writer, I only photograph, in words, what I see. If I write of "sadism" it is because it exists, I didn't invent it, and if some terrible act occurs in my work it is because such things happen in our lives. I am not on the side of evil, if such a thing as evil abounds. In my writing I do not always agree with what occurs, nor do I linger in the mud for the sheer sake of it. Also, it is curious that the people who rail against my work seem to overlook the sections of it which entail joy and love and hope, and there are such sections. My days, my years, my life has seen up and downs, lights and darknesses. If I wrote only and continually of the "light" and never mentioned the other, then as an artist I would be a liar.

Censorship is the tool of those who have the need to hide actualities from themselves and from others. Their fear is only their inability to face what is real, and I can't vent any anger against them. I only feel this appalling sadness. Somewhere, in their upbringing, they were shielded against the total facts of our existence. They were only taught to look one way when many ways exist.

I am not dismayed that one of my books has been hunted down and dislodged from the shelves of a local library. In a sense, I am honored that I have written something that has awakened these from their non-ponderous depths. But I am hurt, yes, when somebody else's book is censored, for that book, usually is a great book and there are few of those, and throughout the ages that type of book has often generated into a classic, and what was once thought shocking and immoral is now required reading at many of our universities.

I am not saying that my book is one of those, but I am saying that in our time, at this moment when any moment may be the last for many of us, it's damned galling and impossibly sad that we still have among us the small, bitter people, the witch-hunters and the declaimers against reality. Yet, these too belong with us, they are part of the whole, and if I haven't written about them, I should, maybe have here, and that's enough.

may we all get better together,
yrs,

Spoiler:

Censorship is the tool of those who have the need to hide actualities from themselves and from others. Their fear is only their inability to face what is real, and I can't vent any anger against them. I only feel this appalling sadness. Somewhere, in their upbringing, they were shielded against the total facts of our existence. They were only taught to look one way when many ways exist.